Which philosophical assumption relates to the consequences of actions in determining moral correctness?

Utilitarian ethics is grounded in the principle that the moral value of an action is determined by its consequences. This ethical framework posits that actions are considered morally right if they lead to the greatest good or happiness for the greatest number of people. Essentially, utilitarianism evaluates the outcomes of actions, suggesting that the end results are what make an action right or wrong.

In contrast, deontological ethics focuses on rules and duties rather than outcomes, emphasizing the inherent morality of actions regardless of their consequences. Moral absolutism asserts that certain actions are right or wrong universally, based on clear moral laws, without regard to situational context or outcomes. Normative ethics, while encompassing various theories including utilitarianism, does not specifically focus on consequences but rather on establishing standards for determining ethical behavior.

Thus, the emphasis on consequences in determining moral correctness distinctly aligns with utilitarian ethics, making it the correct answer to the question.