Which of the following questions helps define theories of crime causation regarding free will?

The question that helps define theories of crime causation regarding free will centers on the belief in human beings being freewilled and completely responsible for their behavior. This notion is foundational in criminology as it delves into the philosophical debate regarding determinism versus free will. Theories of crime causation often explore whether individuals have the autonomy to make choices, including the choice to commit crimes.

By affirming that people are fully responsible for their behavior, the question aligns with classical criminological theories, which posit that individuals possess free will and make rational choices based on self-interest. This perspective emphasizes personal accountability and the idea that individuals are capable of controlling their actions.

In contrast, the other options address different aspects of societal beliefs and constructs but do not directly relate to the philosophical discussion of free will in the context of crime causation. For example, questioning whether people are inherently good or whether crime is a social construct focuses on moral perspectives and societal definitions rather than individual choice. Similarly, the inquiry about belief in a social contract hints at collective agreements in society but does not pinpoint the individual's role in exercising free will in their actions. Thus, the focus on free will is essential for comprehending various crime theories and how they frame individual responsibility regarding criminal behavior.