What was the twofold representation of life illustrated by the analogy of a game of bridge concerning determinism and free will?

The analogy of a game of bridge effectively illustrates the relationship between determinism and free will by highlighting how players must navigate constraints while still making choices. In bridge, the cards dealt to each player represent the deterministic factors in life—circumstances beyond an individual's control, such as genetics, upbringing, and societal influence. These factors set limitations on the options available.

However, within these constraints, players still have the power to make strategic decisions based on their dealt cards, embodying the concept of free will. They can choose how to play their hand, which reflects the ability to make choices that can influence outcomes. This duality is crucial to understanding human behavior and decision-making, as it encompasses both the inevitability of certain life circumstances and the autonomy individuals possess in shaping their actions and responses.

This perspective on life emphasizes that while some elements may be predetermined or outside our control, there remains a significant demand for personal agency in decision-making processes. The interplay between these concepts forms a comprehensive understanding of human existence, making the association of determinism with free will particularly apt in the context of this analogy.