What does the perspective that rejects repressive state violence and advocates restorative justice refer to?

The perspective that rejects repressive state violence and advocates restorative justice is best captured by Peacemaking Criminology. This approach emphasizes the importance of non-violence, social justice, and community involvement as means of addressing crime and conflict. Peacemaking Criminology seeks to understand the social contexts that contribute to criminal behavior and advocates for solutions that restore harmony and repair relationships, rather than solely focusing on punishment.

This framework aligns closely with the principles of restorative justice, which emphasizes repairing the harm caused by criminal behavior through dialogue, understanding, and reconciliation among victims, offenders, and the community. It diverges from traditional law enforcement approaches that may rely heavily on punitive measures, viewing such methods as ultimately counterproductive and harmful.

In contrast, while other options like Critical Criminology and Rehabilitative Criminology consider aspects of social justice and rehabilitation, they do not inherently reject state violence or promote restorative practices with the same core focus as Peacemaking Criminology does. Restorative Justice Theory is closely related but does not encapsulate the broader moral and philosophical elements of peace and non-violence that Peacemaking Criminology advocates. Thus, Peacemaking Criminology is the most accurate descriptor of a perspective promoting restorative justice