What are the three major views on the nature of humans regarding morality?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the UCF CCJ3014 exam with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Get ready for success!

The rationale for selecting the view that people are born inherently good, inherently bad, or born with a blank slate captures the essence of the discussions surrounding human nature and morality. This perspective highlights the philosophical debate between different schools of thought regarding morality and human behavior.

The idea of individuals being inherently good suggests a belief in the essential goodness of human beings and the potential for positive moral actions. Conversely, the perspective of inherent badness posits that humans have a predisposition towards immoral behavior. The concept of a blank slate, rooted in the philosophical ideas of John Locke, proposes that individuals are shaped by their experiences and environment, implying that morality is constructed rather than innate.

Together, these views offer a comprehensive framework for understanding the complexities of human behavior and morality, debating whether moral characteristics are embedded within individuals from birth, influenced by societal factors, or formed through life experiences. This multifaceted perspective allows for a richer analysis of moral development and ethical behavior in the context of society.